Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:30:20 UTC

B.2.2:4.1 - Reuse The B.2 Candidate And Complete System Recognition

Keep B.2’s one resultHolonRef for the exact candidate new whole and its one resultHolonKindRef, which here resolves to the already admitted U.System kind. The references may appear in B.2’s optional HolonReidentificationRecord when a receiving use needs a durable account; B.2.2 adds no second record.

Before calling the candidate a system result:

  1. execute the complete A.1 criterion over the candidate’s exact constituents, obtaining constructive relations, governed assembly, reidentification rule, and composition-grounded whole characteristic;
  2. show that its actual boundary, interfaces, relevant characteristics, and identity-preservation conditions satisfy at least one applicable governed larger-assembly construction method or rule under which it can remain a constituent;
  3. apply the direct U.System criterion to that same individual: its actual physical or operational organization must make it eligible to act causally in work or transformation while preserving its identity;
  4. recover only the additional system facts used by the concrete case—including any delimitation, objective, commitments, coordination, capability, system-role kind or assignment, method, work, transformation, functioning, architecture, evidence, assurance, or temporal claim—and state each through the pattern that defines its object or relation; and
  5. keep the classification judgment, evidence or assurance, currentness, and receiving reliance separate from those world-side facts.

If a required A.1 component or the acting-eligibility criterion fails, do not identify the candidate as the system result. If an additional system fact needed for another claim is absent, withhold that claim rather than treating its absence as failure of the U.System criterion. If missing evidence or an unavailable dependency prevents a determination, report unknown; neither a filled reference nor an optional record changes that result.