B.2.2:8 - Consequences

Positive consequences:

• Meta-system transition remains usable for engineering and organizational systems without making B.2 system-only.
• System ontic preservation becomes explicit: the same exact candidate is recognized under A.1 and U.System, while each system fact and claim stays with its subject pattern.
• Assurance, responsibility, architecture, work, and evidence claims are kept with their subject patterns.

Costs:

• A system-result MHT cannot be declared by name, diagram, dashboard, or metric jump alone.
• Teams must separate old component evidence from result-system evidence.
• Some apparent emergence claims return to ordinary system aggregation, capability, measurement, or architecture repair.