B.2.3:8 - Consequences
Positive consequences:
- Episteme-result MHT becomes usable without preserving title mnemonics as ontology.
- C.2.1 remains the episteme identity pattern.
- Publications, source use, synthesis work, evidence, assurance, and acting systems remain separate.
Costs:
- A claimed synthesis must identify and test the current C.2.1 constitution, not only cite a portfolio.
- Result-episteme assurance requires a fresh applicability judgment for the exact result claim; existing relations may be reused where that judgment warrants it.
- Some “new theory” claims return to publication, source-use, morphism, benchmark, or evidence-use patterns.