B.2.P:10 - SoTA-Echoing

Line of practice	Practical implication for B.2.P
Emergence and whole-level behavior literature distinguishes new-whole questions from ordinary characteristic, capability, and measurement claims.	B.2.P keeps whole reidentification with `B.2` and assigns ordinary characteristic, capability, evidence, and measurement claims to their subject patterns.
Systems and holonic practice use collection and whole language for many different objects.	B.2.P requires membership, constructed whole, acting collective system, whole-level characteristic bearer, and candidate new holon named by an MHT claim to be identified separately.
Mathematical and statistical treatments of scale, coarse-graining, graphs, morphisms, and benchmarks can clarify a claim without replacing the ontology.	B.2.P uses `C.29` for the mathematical-lens claim and still requires the in-life EntityOfConcern and direct subject pattern.
Publication and model practice often makes the description more visible than the described holon or characteristic.	B.2.P separates publication, source-use, model, dashboard, and architecture-description claims from the in-life whole-reidentification claim.