B.2.P:5 - Archetypal Grounding (Worked Cases)
B.2.P:5.1 - “The Fleet Emerged As A New Actor”
Recover:
- Is “fleet” a membership set, collection-as-whole, acting collective system, or the candidate new system named by an MHT claim?
- Does the agency wording name an admitted System, an agency-relevant characteristic or threshold, a local system-role kind, a separate System-classification judgment, an obtaining assignment, or only ordinary prose? Recover these independently: the characteristic can obtain without an assignment and the System may participate passively. Send unresolved claim-bearing “role” wording through
E.10.ROLE. - Does the candidate new system have its own delimitation, objective, coordination, and capability envelope, and is the reidentification claim separately supported by evidence and assurance?
If the candidate new whole is an acting system, use B.2 and B.2.2. If the case is only a managed collection with a whole-level metric, use A.14, C.13, B.3.5, and C.16.
B.2.P:5.2 - “The Model Shows Emergent Robustness”
Recover:
- Which claims concern the model as a description episteme, and which concern its mathematical expression or lens use?
- Is robustness a characteristic-space claim?
- Is the result a benchmark artifact?
- Is there an in-life holon whole-reidentification question?
For those direct claims, use C.29, C.16, A.10, and source-use patterns as applicable. Use B.2 when the identity of the in-life whole remains the question.
B.2.P:5.3 - “A Meta-Functional Transition Happened”
Recover:
- Is there capability or functioning evidence?
- Do separately governed capability or functioning facts make a whole-reidentification question live, with evidence only supporting the claim about those facts?
- Is the concern function-like wording, a functional-structure view, a method-and-work relation, or a candidate new holon?
Use B.2.4 only for the B.2-facing whole-reidentification case. Otherwise use A.6.F, A.2.2, C.16, A.3.4, C.30.TFS-REL, A.15, or architecture patterns.
B.2.P:5.4 - “The Selected Context Became A Meta-System”
Recover the exact selected relation organization. If it is BoundedModelUseStructure, keep it as dependent U.Structure under A.1.1 and A.22. A context label, Context Map, diagram, or selection decision supplies no constituents, part relations, agency, holonhood, or MHT. If the source instead concerns an actual system whole, identify that system and its construction independently before B.2.
B.2.P:5.5 - “The Evidence For Emergence Was Lost”
Recover the exact whole-reidentification assertion, its evidence or assurance relation, the selected assertion edition, and the receiving work. Missing evidence can make a governed evaluation return unknown; a stale edition can fail G.11 currentness; a person or System performing the receiving work can decline reliance, defer, or reopen. None of those results reverses an actual construction or changes the direct rule that decides whether the existing whole continues or a new whole must be identified. Do not rewrite evidence loss as absence of the whole or as a new MHT.
B.2.P:5.6 - “The Assembly Changes Form One Higher-Level Change”
Identify each actual change independently under A.3.4. A shared work occurrence, flow, changed referent, time window, method decomposition, or C.13 construction trace does not make those changes parts of one transformation. If the use requires a composite transformation and no direct governor supplies constituent contribution, compatibility, boundary, interfaces, whole identity, and reidentification, return that exact blocker. Do not infer either composition or atomism.