fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 40749–40758

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 06:25:20 UTC

B.2:3 - Forces

ForceTension
Parsimony vs real noveltyFPF should not mint new wholes for every improvement, but some closures really change the EntityOfConcern.
Continuity vs reidentificationHistory and phase continuity matter, but some transitions require identification of a new whole.
Trigger recognition vs trigger inflationDelimitation, part-relation, objective, supervision, capability, agency-threshold, and temporal cues help recognition but do not declare MHT by themselves.
System-facing emergence vs broader holonsHolonic systems literature is system-facing, while FPF also needs cases in which the candidate new whole is an episteme, method, work occurrence, or discipline.
Math-lens power vs ontology disciplineRG-like, graph, algebraic, or benchmark expressions can bear on a claim only after the holon and relation are named.