B.3.3:2 - Problem

How can a recipient distinguish relevant conceptual, logical and empirical support without mistaking a link, evidence type, score or maturity label for an argument that the relied-on claim is adequately supported?

The tension is between comparable reporting and unlike assurance questions. Repeatable criteria help a shared use; a universal ladder hides differences in claim scope, consequences, assumptions and admissible evidence. Formal precision helps inspect an inference, but cannot compensate for an inapplicable premise.