Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:40:18 UTC

B.4.1:15 - Migration and worked continuation boundaries

B.4.1 governs route publication. Use the applicable subject patterns for abductive reasoning, lexical repair, deontic commitment, and work execution when their entry conditions are met.

B.4.1:15.1 - Migration from anomaly-first prose

Older anomaly-first language should be migrated into route publication when the publication does not yet meet anomaly-governance entry conditions.

B.4.1:15.2 - Intervention vs inquiry split

An operator-facing disturbance may legitimately support both:

  • an immediate intervention-oriented route,
  • and a slower explanatory route.

B.4.1 preserves both continuations with their own grounds and selection conditions.

B.4.1:15.3 - Requirement-route overreach

A route set that includes RequirementCommitmentRoute should not be read as if the requirement already exists. The route is one admissible continuation; the requirement or commitment claim is decided under its own subject pattern.

B.4.1:15.4 - Leaving the seam

Continue under a later subject pattern when its own entry conditions are met. Typical questions and entry requirements are:

  • relation-bearing wording whose direct relation, participants, direction, or required detail remain unresolved: A.6.P;
  • evaluative wording with enough articulation to name the bearer, effective scheme, probe/model frame, comparison frame or none, ClaimScope, and at least one candidate evaluative family: C.16.Q;
  • affordance-like or action-first wording with enough context to compare its consequential meanings: A.6.A; recover the supported claim or question, or the exact fact that would distinguish the alternatives, then apply its subject rule;
  • a declared prompt species, stable open question, scope, and provenance, with the articulation and closure conditions for rival answers to remain live: B.5.2.0;
  • an explicit requirement or commitment claim over its actual subject: its requirement-facing pattern; use A.2.8 for a question about an actual individual duty;
  • or an alignment question involving Method, intended WorkPlan, or actual Work: A.15; use A.3.1, A.15.2, or A.15.1 directly when only the Method, WorkPlan, or dated Work is in question.

ActionInvitationRoute names the route to this wording-recovery use; it does not require an invitation occurrence. A.6.A can return an open question without settling its answer. If the selected next-use entry conditions cannot yet be established, keep the governed publication in this seam with its route plurality visible.