B.5.1:4 - Conformance Checklist

• CC-B5.1.1 (State Explicitness): A state-bearing U.Episteme or U.System coordinated through this development model MUST be tagged with its current state from {Exploration, Shaping, Evidence, Operation}. Identify the development subject; a separate bounded result need not be given that subject’s state.
• CC-B5.1.2 (Sequential Progression): When advancing the development subject through this cycle, the project SHALL follow the state sequence. A departure MUST be justified against the intended transition’s actual prerequisites; it cannot waive binding proof, validation or operational conditions. Completing or using a sufficient bounded result without advancing the development subject is not a skipped state and needs no skip justification.
• CC-B5.1.3 (Reasoning Cycle Alignment): A transition MUST have the reasoning contributions and results needed by its applicable project and domain conditions. Before a hypothesis-led test, derive the consequences needed to interpret it. Reuse applicable prior reasoning or evidence when it meets those conditions; repeat a phase only for an actual unresolved need. Phase completion alone SHALL NOT confer an assurance level or operational permission.