B.5.3:4 - Solution

Use this bounded interpretation move when domain vocabulary leaves the FPF claim unclear.

1. Start from the exact expression, source, edition, and relevant passage. Use F.0.1 to recover the source-local claim. Recover an F.17 cell and test its basis relation when the current claim needs them, including when an F.9 Bridge is claimed. Add a durable term row only when the receiving use needs that packaging under F.17.
2. Ask which exact FPF value or relation the current claim needs, then use the pattern that defines or constrains it. For example, the answer may concern a System, characteristic, Method, Work occurrence, episteme, system-role assignment, or evidence-use relation; the list is illustrative, not a set of new bridge kinds.
3. If the use really needs a new kind, apply E.24.UK and C.3. A familiar expression, table row, or diagram label supplies no kindhood.
4. If the recovered source-local claim already answers the question, return it and stop. If a receiving use must relate two distinct local-sense claims, use F.9 to test whether an exact Bridge between their F.17 cells actually obtains. Shared spelling, a mapping table, or a completed card proves no such relation.
5. State the receiving use separately. Name the direction, scope or applicability boundary, tolerated loss, evidence or reliance basis, and reopen condition only when each changes that use. The semantic relation alone neither authorizes nor performs the use.
6. When role wording is material, use E.10.ROLE and A.2 to distinguish a local system-role kind, classification, assignment, participation, responsibility, or ordinary language before making the direct claim.

The practical result can be one readable sentence. Use a note, row, or card only when a later reader or tool needs durable packaging. The package describes the result; it does not create the FPF value, local meaning, relation, or permitted use.

An alias says only that L is another name for V. A completed B.5.3 move instead says what the exact source means here, which FPF value the current claim uses, whether any direct relation actually obtains, and what the named receiving use may rely on. Thus a component called “sensor” may lead to a System claim, measurement-capability claim, publication claim, or system-role-assignment claim; the expression alone chooses none of them.