B.5.MPC:4.8 - Divide human and AI contributions by the result they must supply

Allocate work around the dependencies above. A contributor can supply a physical account, a mathematical construction, a proof, a computation, a proposed realization or an explanation of the connection. State the working question, available inputs, missing result and intended use when obtaining help through A.15.9. Ask for the formulation itself when the equation has not yet been constructed.

Retain enough understanding at each receiving point to use and question its input. The receiver of a motion count should be able to identify its unit, the rotation it counts, its sign and its dependence on the motion model. The receiver of a two-colouring result should be able to connect the returned labels or odd-cycle witness to the actual contact list. The receiver of an occupancy bound should be able to identify the material and procedural conditions that preserve the stock.

That understanding can be held by one person or distributed across people and AI with an effective way to obtain a missing explanation. Arrange a capable contribution for each consequential connection. A completed report alone does not establish that this capability is available when a premise changes.

Choose depth from the later work. Using a stable formula may require interpretation and checks at the connection. Changing the formula requires understanding its derivation. Designing a new algorithm or physical theory requires the additional specialist capability. When assessing a person’s preparation, examine their contribution on representative work with the assistance that will actually be available. Include a change of the requested result or a relevant premise when later work requires that adaptation. Ask the practitioner to recover the retained relation, the new unknown and the dependent physical operation.