Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:10:10 UTC

B.5.TC:4.2 - Recover an application of each account

For each account, recover the objects and relations used, what is supplied or assumed, the operation that obtains the answer, and how that answer is interpreted. Follow the reasoning far enough to reproduce the step on which the comparison turns. B.5.TU, B.5.RC and B.5.RA supply application, construction and argument recovery when needed.

Preserve the source’s distinctions during this work. If two accounts use state differently, explain which information each state retains and what continuation it determines. If a symbol has no counterpart, say what the account does with it before proposing a correspondence. Translate the required objects and operations; a word-to-word substitution alone cannot settle their relation.

An account may need information the present work lacks. Separate a supplied premise, a proposed premise and a derived result in the explanation. Continue conditionally when that is useful: “Under this independence assumption the minimum is 3; if continuations depend on the incoming route, we must retain that dependency.”

A collaborator or tool can supply a calculation or proof. Recover the interpretation and conditions needed to compare its contribution. Learn or request the missing operation when you cannot yet follow the decisive step; a broad study of both theories is unnecessary when a smaller contribution settles the use.