C.11:4.2a - Receive heterogeneous premises without relabeling them as signals

An interesting observation, information-gain estimate, capability result, objective or reward, articulated former cue, or C.17 characterization enters this pattern only under its exact source/result identity. Use E.10.LRN first when learning wording still hides that identity. Use A.10 when an evidence-bearing or source-bearing claim is actually relied on: its existing RelianceDisposition qualifies only that bounded premise use. An objective, reward, preference, or loss enters as the EvaluativeMeasure, PreferenceOrder, or ChoiceRule input it actually supplies and is not evidence by numerical form. When an A.16.1 cue pack remains current as a source or provenance episteme, preserve that source identity and route the separately articulated endpoint result through its direct claim owner. A C.17 novelty, surprise, use, or creativity characterization remains a characterization and does not license a move by itself.

No separate premise-qualification result sits between those owners and C.11. Use the qualified inputs in the live option/probe comparison and return only the existing ChoiceResult. When the missing comparison basis is specifically what a finite candidate contributes relative to the current configuration, use C.11.CRC to construct that ordinary comparison claim and return here. If every premise and the finite comparison are already explicit, proceed directly.