fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 53555–53567

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 07:42:37 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 07:43:27 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:55:10 UTC

C.11:4.5.2 - Boundary on multilevel and social-expectation doctrine

DecisionSubject and DecisionSubjectGranularity are the local answer to human-only and individual-only narrowing. They keep the chooser explicit at person, team, organization, or other collectivity-bearing level so the doctrine does not silently collapse back into one generic individual agent.

This minimal choice doctrine does not yet settle all of the heavier doctrine that can sit behind that wider chooser-bearing scope. In particular, this body does not yet fully settle:

  • collective aggregation doctrine over conflicting preferences or criteria;
  • cross-scale or cross-collective conflict between person-, team-, organization-, or broader system-level objectives;
  • one full ROE or social-expectation structure for socially scaffolded choice;
  • one full multilevel or geometry-heavy formal package for those cross-scale or cross-collective questions.

Those absences are not hidden exceptions. They are explicit scope boundaries of this C.11 body. If one of those heavier questions is already live in the case, the decision record should say that the local C.11 floor is being used only as the current typed floor and should keep the unresolved aggregation, ROE, or multilevel support question visible by value.