C.11:5.3 - Collective and contextual grounding

Tell. A clinical board must decide whether to escalate a patient now or order one more test. The board is the chooser, not one isolated individual, and the result shifts when the case is discussed in prognosis-first versus risk-first order.

Show. C.11 keeps the case legible by typing the chooser as one DecisionSubject at explicit DecisionSubjectGranularity, keeping the available actions as one current OptionSet, keeping one explicit BeliefState and OutcomeModel around those actions, and asking whether another test belongs in the ProbeActionSet with enough expected value to justify its CostToProbe.

Show. Active-inference-adjacent pressure is visible because the chooser is embodied, online, and socially coupled; quantum-like pressure is visible because context and question order change the comparison state. C.11 keeps both repaired limitations visible without pretending that the whole pattern has already become one full active-inference or quantum-like formal package.

Show. If the order effect still changes which option survives, the comparison should say that directly and keep the comparison unfinished. The next comparison move is then either one framing-stabilizing probe or declaring the comparison order under which the current result will be judged. It should not hide that instability inside one vague statement that the board has mixed intuitions.

Show. An admissible output here therefore looks like one of three concrete records:

• ChoiceResult = probe again with one rapid diagnostic test because the current prognosis-first versus risk-first framing still changes which option survives;
• ChoiceResult = choose now and escalate because, under the fixed risk-first order and current evidence, no remaining feasible test can reverse the survivor relation before delay increases harm;
• ChoiceResult = reroute to C.24 because the board has already chosen escalation and the next task is now treatment sequencing rather than local choice.

Show. The output still has to be one actionable record. If the current result cannot say which of those three forms is now lawful, then the contextual pressure has been noticed but not yet carried into one usable decision result.