C.13:3 - Forces

• Parsimony vs truth. Three construction forms are easier to reuse than an open constructor catalogue, but no form may replace a missing direct relation or assembly rule.
• Readable statement vs constructive account. Practitioners need ordinary component, belongs-to, and aspect statements; reviewers may also need to inspect how those relations support the named whole, collection, or aspect.
• Input set vs assembly. The same entities can be assembled through different obtaining relations and can therefore yield different wholes.
• Continuity vs extensional snapshots. Constituents and part-relation occurrences can change while the same whole continues when its direct reidentification rule permits the phase change.
• Construction vs evidence. A trace states the construction account; evidence and assurance separately support or warrant the claim content.
• Cross-domain reuse vs owner bypass. Systems, epistemes, methods, and work occurrences can all need constructive grounding, but their direct patterns retain kind, part, and identity authority.