C.16.Q:4.10 - Progressive elaboration

C.16.Q permits monotone elaboration:

1. Select a QualitySense and retain rival candidates while ambiguity is live.
2. Name the exact bearer, effective ReferenceScheme, U.ClaimScope, and any meaning-changing Γ_time, reference plane, representation scheme, or substrate.
3. Name the probe or model frame and the separate comparison frame or explicit none; then name evaluator and U.ViewpointRef independently.
4. Choose an admissible normal form and identify any separately constituted quality-result claim.
5. Add exemplars, probes, characteristic heads, bundle members, objective pins, witness refs, and exact A.10 evidence-provenance paths as needed. Cite empirical grounding only through an independently obtaining relation.
6. If cross-local correspondence is live, resolve exact F.17 cells, the obtaining F.9 Bridge, and the separate bounded-use claim. Add a Card only as optional packaging and an F.9.1 stance note only as optional reader help about that claim.
7. If the repaired sentence is boundary-bearing, emit L/A/D/E hooks rather than letting quality carry them implicitly.
8. Never move between sense families, frames, schemes, scopes, result claims, or neighboring relations silently.