C.16.Q:4.8a - A.6.B boundary classification template for quality-term repair
When a repaired quality statement becomes boundary-bearing, classify it explicitly:
- L —
qualityTermAscriptionrepair-form skeleton,QualitySensesemantics, normal-form admissibility, cross-local routing, and the rule that any F.9.1 stance note remains a separate optional episteme about an already constituted bounded-use claim; - A — admissibility conditions for using the ascription in selector, gating, and publication lanes (required qualifiers, witnesses, thresholds, qualification windows);
- D — publication requirements (lexical firewall, mandatory rewrites, publication duties);
- E — carrier-anchored evidence and work effects (measurements, traces, critique sheets, probe packs, selector logs).
Where this family is published as a reusable boundary publication, stable L-Q*, A-Q*, D-Q*, and E-Q* claim ids SHOULD be published (or the reused L/A/D/E-classified claim set should be cited by location), and paraphrase drift across quadrants SHALL be avoided.
Do not let the bare word quality carry L/A/D/E claim by itself.