| Magic scalar quality | one number silently stands for several evaluative families | conflates senses and bearers and ignores scoring legality | publish one explicit QualitySense and an admissible normal form |
| Preconceptual-as-metric | felt fit is presented as if it were already a measured characteristic | erases articulation stage and overstates evidence | keep it as SignalPack until an admissible proxy is declared |
| Engineering adjective drift | reliable, maintainable, or high-quality appear with no explicit Characteristic or Q-Bundle | hides measurement shape and scope | rewrite to one U.Characteristic or one Q-Bundle |
| Selector ambiguity | quality in QD and NQD is left undefined | breaks comparability and selection semantics | default to QS.UseValue unless another objective head is declared explicitly |
| Model-quality collapse | latent fit, explanatory merit, and control adequacy are merged under one phrase | destroys bearer and frame distinctions | split into separate qualityTermAscription(...) records |
| Architecture-vs-description collapse | architecture quality is used with no explicit bearer lane | collapses the system-side bearer into its description, carrier, or publication face | publish the bearer lane explicitly and select QS.EngineeringQualityFamily or QS.ArchitecturalDescriptionFitness |
| Action-invitation-as-quality | action invitations are narrated as if they were evaluations | the rewrite hides action semantics instead of clarifying them | stop the Q-rewrite and apply A.6.A for wording recovery, then the pattern for the recovered claim or question; state the actual claim or question and the participants and conditions its use needs; keep source-tradition affordance wording only as a quoted cue |
| Generic-frame collapse | one evaluationFrame or context label is expected to supply probe, model, comparison, scope, and scheme semantics | hides independently governed choices and makes a changed comparison look like the same claim | name the effective ReferenceScheme, probe/model frame, A.19.CPM comparison frame, and ClaimScope separately |
| Embedded viewpoint | the record stores a viewpoint-looking value as evaluator or generic context | collapses reference, viewpoint episteme, evaluator, and result | store one governed U.ViewpointRef or none; resolve it under E.17.0 and keep evaluator separate |
| Witness-is-grounding | a test report, trace, score, or filled record is cited as empirical grounding | presence of a carrier or result label establishes no direct relation | name witness refs and A.10 path separately; cite an exact obtaining EpistemeEmpiricalGroundingRelation or none |
| Bridge-by-label or stance note | shared quality wording or an F.9.1 stance word is treated as the cross-local relation or use authority | creates false identity, silent loss, and unauthorized substitution | resolve exact F.17 cells, test and cite the F.9 Bridge, then state the separate bounded-use claim; add a Card only as optional packaging and a stance note only when its EntityOfConcern is that claim |