Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 06:55:20 UTC

C.17:9.1 - Pump design: stop early or open the measurement branch

Identify P-22 as the exact design episteme. Compared with the admitted five-year pump-design set, its inspected split-clamp arrangement is a supported difference. Assembly evidence supports shorter assembly, and the candidate must not require new tooling. State what was inspected and the limit of that support. Stop here when the discussion needs neither a quantified coordinate nor a reusable result.

To use Novelty value 0.42, cite P22-NoveltyResult-4, an already constituted C.16 measurement-result episteme. Its chain identifies P-22 as measurand, the Novelty Characteristic and Scale, exact similarity Method, the calibrated [0,1] CAD-graph similarity result used by the declared Novelty construction, encoder and model edition, uncertainty, dated measurement Work, actual bindings, time, and evidence. The Method compares P22-CADGraph-7, produced from and representing P-22 under CADGraphProjection-2, with graphs produced by the same projection for every corpus design; the result states that this projection omits surface finish and manufacturing tolerances. If the current action measures novelty, constitute that chain first. State the no-tooling-change coordinate as a C.2.1 ascription under its declared criterion unless it was independently measured.

One CreativityEvaluationResult may cite those coordinates and state only that P-22 is eligible for the current comparison and lies on the declared non-dominated set. Building that result does not assert separate overall-assessment Work.

If an audit later asserts that an overall assessment occurred, identify the evaluator System, its exact assignment, PumpCreativityAssessment-17 Work, and PumpCreativityAssessmentMethod-2; state that the Work enacts the Method. The MethodDescription explains the Method, the result states claims, and coordinate-measurement Work stays separate. Do not add an A.6.1 operation application merely because those values are recorded. If the audit separately asserts an exact operation application or binding, satisfy the current A.6.1 application account and cite that application.