fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 58197–58204

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:15:10 UTC

C.19.2:12 - Relations

  • Coordinates with: C.39 for a missing explanation of how to obtain the result; C.40 for feasible variation and examination; C.18 for the generation account and archive/front stewardship; C.19 for explore/exploit policy over still-live candidate pools; C.19.1 for scale-amenable bearer preference; C.22.1 for adaptation signatures; E.23 for repeated improvement; and C.31.ASAP for architecture-scale preference.
  • Uses conditionally: C.11 only when an actual local-choice question over a live eligible set exists. It consumes, but does not extend, the four ChoiceResult dispositions.
  • Hands off enactment to: A.15.2 for work plans, A.15.1 for dated work, and C.24 only for tool-call enactment planning. The direct domain pattern contains the defining content for the practical result.
  • Description-level specialization: A.7.1 narrows the method claims stated here for consequence-guided ontology analysis. It retains the declared use, problem-facing result, claimed guarantee, horizon, useful threshold, separation among plan, Work, and result, stop, and reopen. It retains the candidate and choice branch only when that branch is actually triggered. This wording adds no relation occurrence between the described Methods and asserts neither U.SubkindOf nor a world relation.
  • Does not replace: durable U-kind admission in E.24/E.24.UK, parsimony in A.11, evidence-use and assurance patterns, or any candidate’s direct kind.