C.2.1:4.10 - Relation and neighboring-object reference
| Current object | FPF kind or relation | Subject pattern |
|---|---|---|
U.Episteme | one knowledge holon with identity <claim content, EntityOfConcern, effective ReferenceScheme> | C.2.1 |
EpistemeConstitutionRelation occurrence | the obtaining direct relation among the exact claim graph, exact EntityOfConcern, and effective reference scheme that constructively identifies one episteme | C.2.1 and A.6.REL |
EpistemeEmpiricalGroundingRelation occurrence | the direct relation between one identified episteme and one exact grounding holon for one exact nonempty covered claim subgraph, while every empirical claim in that subgraph has a current mapping to the required observation, intervention, measurement, or test relations involving that holon; evaluation or evidence supports an assertion unless explicitly mapped as part of the empirical test | C.2.1 and the governing observation, intervention, measurement, test, evaluation, or evidence patterns |
| classification assertion episteme, when separately current | a claim-bearing episteme whose EntityOfConcern is the exact candidate and whose claim content states a classification judgment under the exact governing criterion: A.1 for an admitted holon kind or C.3.2 for a local kind | C.2.1 for assertion identity; the pattern governing the criterion for the judgment; E.24.UK only for public U-kind admission |
EpistemeEditionRelation occurrence | the direct historical continuation relation between one exact earlier episteme and one exact later episteme; exact source use, the applicable continuation policy or rule, and the preserved and deliberately changed claim, EntityOfConcern, and scheme features decide whether it obtains; Work, Method, provenance, and change facts supply case facts only; apply the shared 4.9 inception boundary only when that separate fact is consumed | C.2.1, coordinated with C.2.P, A.3.1, A.3.4, and C.2.1:4.9 only for a separately current inception claim |
EpistemeConstitutionRelationSignature, EpistemeEmpiricalGroundingRelationSignature, or EpistemeEditionRelationSignature | one C.2.1 declaration episteme whose exact EntityOfConcern is its direct relation kind; the fixed A.6.0 predicate gives that same individual U.Signature membership, and RelationSignature is its relation-facing use with complete direct semantics and exact A.6.5 SlotSpecs | C.2.1 for declaration identity, A.6.0 for membership and reusable vocabulary, and A.6.5 for SlotSpecs |
SlotSpec | one declaration-content component of that RelationSignature | A.6.5 |
| assertion or description episteme | a claim-bearing episteme that states or describes one of the direct relations | C.2.1 and the direct claim or description pattern |
U.MethodDescription | the same U.Episteme individual when A.3.2 recognizes one admitted U.Method as its exact EntityOfConcern and its claims, interpreted under the effective U.ReferenceScheme, make at least one substantive claim about that method as a way of doing; mention, bibliographic metadata, or approval alone does not establish membership, and adequacy for a receiving use is evaluated separately | C.2.1 for episteme identity; A.3.2 for dependent-kind membership |
U.View | the same U.Episteme individual when it conforms to at least one exact U.Viewpoint episteme; formally, when EpistemeViewpointConformanceRelation(E,P) obtains for that pair | C.2.1 for episteme identity; E.17.0 for dependent-kind membership; A.6.3 only when source-to-receiving construction is current. Conformance of E to P, that construction, current-use selection, and publication remain separate. |
| describing-use viewpoint selection | one named describing use selects one already identified U.Viewpoint episteme through an exact reference; it selects no view | E.10.D2 and E.17.0 |
| multi-view collection or organization | an exact C.13 collection only when a receiving use depends on the plurality as a collection, and an exact A.22 U.Structure only when that use additionally depends on organization among those views | C.13, A.22, and the direct organizing relations |
| cross-view correspondence, consistency, realization, trace, or change-impact claim | one exact direct subject relation under its own governor; a C.2.1 episteme may assert or describe it, but a heading, edge, carrier, or E.17 publication invents no relation | the exact direct relation pattern; when none is current, return an exact missing-relation blocker naming the participants, required predicate and use, and missing governor |
| publication occurrence | the occurrence that makes one selected episteme edition available to a declared audience for a declared bounded use | E.17 and E.24.PUB |
| publication form | the arrangement, notation, or rendering convention that expresses the selected episteme edition for that publication use | E.17 and E.24.PUB |
U.PresentationCarrier | the exact physical or digital carrier that bears the publication form | E.17 and E.24.PUB |
| mathematical representation | a mathematical representation used for the stated modeling or reasoning purpose | the applicable mathematical or representation pattern; C.29 only for an unresolved mathematical-lens question |
This reference table keeps the neighboring objects and relations visible after the application method. Ordinary prose names only the current object and its direct relation. A sentence such as “Model M concerns Pump P under Scheme S” is sufficient until another use needs explicit empirical grounding, a classification assertion, occurrence identity, edition continuity, publication, or representation correspondence.