C.2.2:9 - Consequences
Informative; non-binding.
| Benefits | Trade-offs and mitigations |
|---|---|
| Conditional comparability. Claims can be compared when their R meanings and models are compatible and F and G are explicit. | No forced score. Some useful syntheses retain heterogeneous support rather than invent numerical comparability. |
| Auditability. Relation-specific reuse loss is visible and localised to R. | Overhead. Declaring the relations actually traversed and the evidence links is work; mitigate with templates and reuse of standard lane schemas. |
| Revisable warrant. New support or counterevidence can change the bounded conclusion under its actual model. | Scalar temptation. Keep distinct support contributions and their limitations visible behind any numerical result. |