C.2.6:17 - Anchoring Shift and Transport Discipline

C.2.6:17.1 - Shift declaration rule

When an episteme crosses from one anchoring mode to another, state whether the shift is merely publication-level or whether it changes what can be preserved, compared, or trusted. A move from operator-loop enactment to report prose, for example, often drops timing, bodily load, and enactment friction.

C.2.6:17.2 - Bridge-loss rule

If an anchoring shift raises a semantic-correspondence question between local senses from different contexts, use F.9 to state and test the Bridge and its bounded-use claim, with the loss account; add an F.9.1 stance note only when it helps explain that claim. C.2.6 only requires the shift to be noticed and not misrepresented as lossless.

C.2.6:17.3 - Same-content illusion test

Two cues may be paraphrased into the same sentence while remaining differently anchored. If the anchoring regime differs, the cues are not automatically substitutable.