fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 51000–51014

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:20:10 UTC

C.2.8:7 - Conformance Checklist

Use this checklist when a characteristic claim or comparison must be relied on or carried to another use. An ordinary local comparison may keep the same information in prose.

CheckRequired content
CC-C.2.8-1 Aspect and arityAn ESI claim SHALL retain the episteme, expressing form and observer, with the selected structure and material comparison conditions recoverable.
CC-C.2.8-2 CorrectnessThe claim SHALL state the relevant source or criterion and distinguish content recovery from a stronger warranted-world conclusion when that distinction matters.
CC-C.2.8-3 ComparisonA claimed difference SHALL identify changed claims, form, preparation, access, help, operations or budget where they can explain the result.
CC-C.2.8-4 ScaleA numerical value SHALL name its scale, structural unit or denominator and method. Ordered scales SHALL retain the positive structural direction; missing basis SHALL remain distinct from zero.
CC-C.2.8-5 GroundsAn observation, design estimate or formal-model estimate SHALL retain its grounds and their actual scope. Prior-expertise correction and additional assistance SHALL be attributed separately where consequential.
CC-C.2.8-6 Formal estimateAn epiplexity or other mathematical estimate used as ESI SHALL have the applicable C.29 correspondence; a claimed measurement SHALL satisfy C.16.
CC-C.2.8-7 Distinct resultsAmount SHALL remain distinguishable from articulation, extraction effort, task utility, evidence strength, learning and robustness.
CC-C.2.8-8 Cold recoveryA publication-reading claim SHALL distinguish case facts from an explanation of the instruction supplied only by the test.