fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 49965–49981

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:20:10 UTC

C.2.LS:18 - Review Matrix and Migration Tests

C.2.LS:18.1 - Review matrix

An assurance reader should ask:

  • does each published facet keep the definition and test supplied by its own pattern rather than by surrogate prose;
  • does any overlay smuggle a hidden scalar or gate decision;
  • are threshold claims tied to the facet that really bears them;
  • do cited moves in A.16, A.16.1, A.16.2, B.4.1, or B.5.2.0 actually match the facet bundle;
  • if the profile crosses a Bridge or viewpoint boundary, did the author use F.9 for the Bridge, bounded-use claim, and loss account, and keep any optional F.9.1 stance note separate rather than importing it as a fake facet?

C.2.LS:18.2 - Migration test for source prose

Source phrases such as “still immature”, “not ready yet”, or “already stable enough” should be unpacked into: which facet is claimed, which anchor or bundle member justifies it, which threshold or route consequence follows, and which cited rule or external authoritySourceRef justifies that consequence.

C.2.LS:18.3 - Comparative profile use

Compare profiles facetwise unless a Context has published an explicit local aggregation for reporting. Such an aggregation remains secondary and must not replace the profile in norms, thresholds, or bridge claims.