C.2.P:11.1 - Relevant FPF Patterns

The current FPF corpus already has patterns that contribute to this discipline:

• E.10 supplies word/head, morphology, register, and naming cues and routes within the connected F.19 reading.
• E.10.D2 gives the “thing vs words vs rules” discipline and the carrier humility rule.
• F.18 gives the local-first naming protocol: governed value and kind; the pattern and contribution that define or constrain them; by-value scheme; local-sense claim; intended use; candidate comparison; and any separately obtaining relation.
• A.6.P gives the relation-precision restoration method: restore generic head kind, build candidate sets for endpoint kinds and relation kinds, select kind-explicit slots and qualifiers, then allow guardrailed wording.
• C.2.1 gives episteme identity through exact claim content, EntityOfConcern, and effective ReferenceScheme and keeps empirical grounding and edition continuity as distinct direct relations.
• A.7 keeps EntityOfConcern, Description episteme, and publication carrier distinct.
• E.17.0 tests view conformance to a viewpoint; E.17 governs reader-facing publication forms for an accepted account; E.24.PUB distinguishes publication occurrence, form, and carrier.
• A.15.4 shows how to keep an encountered publication, display, or low-articulation cue distinct from the project-side FPF kind and reference used for work or reliance.
• A.16 coordinates language-state moves; A.16.0 supplies an optional trajectory account when their history matters; A.19 defines the CharacteristicSpace and its reusable predicates; B.2.5 governs supervisor-subholon feedback; C.27 distinguishes state or rate readings from intervention-sensitive temporal claims; A.3.3 defines the reusable state-space and transition-law episteme.
• E.19 already treats terminology and sentence-level precision restoration as required review checks, not editorial polish.
• A.6.A carries action-invitation discipline when a publication, representation, or cue invites an action without itself becoming authority, evidence, gate passage, or work completion.
• C.11 carries decision-making and decision-record discipline when the question under repair is a decision rather than generic action.
• A.15 and A.15.4 split system-role kind and assignment, Method, WorkPlan, and actual-Work alignment from appearance-based reliance repair; do not use A.15 as a universal repair for episteme-publication wording.
• E.9 is the campaign DRR pattern for campaign-level content decisions; E.11 is only for entry-discoverability situations and must not organize an episteme and publication repair by default.

These internal FPF patterns remain primary:

This reduced external-practice set changes the Solution in one practical way: epistemic precision restoration cannot close merely because the replacement sounds cleaner. The FPF kind, relation, declared use boundary, and any needed pattern application must be recoverable by value; otherwise the wording is blocked or becomes a candidate for a separate FPF-kind decision.