C.20:5.3 - Cross-field reuse does not create a transdiscipline

A safety-engineering team proposes to reuse one resilience-engineering term. F.17 resolves the two exact SchemeSenseCell values, and their semantic-context projections differ. The stated directed BridgePredicateProfile applies to those endpoint readings at its stated as-of basis; the current endpoint meanings satisfy its relation-kind-specific semantic condition and Boolean truth condition; and all required dependencies are present. F.9 therefore identifies an obtaining directed Bridge. A separate bounded-use proposition states the direction, mapping rule, tolerated loss, and polarity for this hazard-review use. Exact review Work may rely on that proposition through A.10, and a comparison may apply A.19.CPM.

These facts establish no disciplinePartOf occurrence and no new discipline. Calling the work transdisciplinary requires a declared classification criterion. Claiming one new integrated discipline requires another exact candidate and all six C.20 construction components; one Bridge, two labels, or two selected structures cannot supply them.