C.20:6 - Bias-Annotation

Apply five complementary lenses; the later risk table does not replace them.

Lens	Question and counter-bias
Governance	Are field names, classification claims, revision rationales, source “steward” or “owner” wording, any separately obtaining kind or assignment, responsibility, authority, ownership, governance, publication Work, and publication availability kept with their subject patterns, or has a name, card, registry, title, or publisher acquired force it does not have?
Architecture	Are construction, Characteristic/Scale, comparison or aggregation, evidence/assurance, health, publication, and selection still separate branches, or has a convenient CAL/CHR-style record become an omnibus discipline constructor?
Onto/Epist	Are the discipline, domain designation, semantic locality, system, episteme, description, representation, and evidence claim distinct, with each claim returning to an exact EntityOfConcern and ReferenceScheme?
Pragmatic	Can ordinary authoring and edition work stop at exact parts, couplings, assembly, and reidentification, while only the receiving comparison, assurance, publication, or decision opens deeper apparatus?
Didactic	Do twin labels, the System/Episteme contrast, cards, columns, diagrams, and examples aid recognition without supplying hidden parts, relations, kinds, identity, or truth?

Scope guard. Every use is bounded by exact field candidates, semantic localities, scopes, editions, and receiving work. There is no context-free or global discipline established by name, popularity, institutional reach, or a shared vocabulary.

Bias risk	Failure	Counter-move
Label realism	A familiar field name is treated as the whole.	Recover candidate, parts, direct occurrences, assembly, identity, and whole characteristic.
Institutionalism	The largest organization carrying the work is treated as the discipline.	Keep the system, system-role kind and assignment, and Work direct; test parthood separately.
Canon or method monocentrism	One document set or method family stands for both knowledge and practice.	Require independently identified contributions on both sides and exact coupling claims.
Schema completion	Five filled positions or heterogeneous fields manufacture construction.	Use the two-participant direct relation and ordinary whole-forming claims; treat cards as descriptions.
Bridge universalism	Translation or high congruence merges fields.	Keep Bridge, bounded-use proposition, reliance, comparison, and discipline construction separate.
Metric reification	Health or maturity value is treated as discipline identity.	Keep C.21 readings and G.4 thresholds as evaluations over the exact discipline.
Snapshot extensionalism	Any changed part creates another discipline, or the same part list guarantees sameness.	Apply the assembly-sensitive reidentification rule.