Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:05:11 UTC

C.20:7.1 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them

Anti-patternRepair
“TDD discipline” or another Method/tradition label already names a discipline.Treat “Test-Driven” as a tradition, method-family, or other local classification only under its exact criterion and subject. Identify each Method under A.3.1; identify a discipline only by the complete C.20 construction test.
“Safety Discipline Owner” or another owner or steward title proves ownership, parthood, responsibility, or decision authority.Treat the title as an E.10.ROLE trigger. Admit the System that actually performs any Work; recover any local system-role kind, classification, or assignment independently; and cite the exact ownership, responsibility, authority, governance, or other direct relation that obtains. If no pattern establishes the stronger relation, return missing-governor.
“ClinicalSafetyDomain Governance” or another compound domain-governance label supplies a discipline and its comparison policy.Separate the subject-area or catalogue label, exact governance system-role kind and assignment, direct governance rule, Work, any independently constructed C.20 discipline, and the A.19.CPM/G.0 comparison declaration. The compound label creates none of those objects or facts.
“The five card positions are filled, so the discipline exists.”Recover the exact candidate, direct part occurrences, whole-forming claims, assembly, reidentification, characteristic, and larger-assembly compatibility.
“The department is the discipline.”Keep the organization as an exact system; apply A.15.1 to any claimed Work and establish any discipline part relation independently.
“Every canonical paper and standard is a discipline part.”Identify each episteme and apply the C.20 predicate; citation, canonical status, or publication is insufficient.
“Every method used in the field is a part.”Identify the Method under A.3.1 and test whether the current assembly makes its contribution constitutive; registry membership and use alone are insufficient.
“The Bridge set assembles a transdiscipline.”Keep each Bridge and bounded-use proposition direct; apply a declared breadth criterion or rerun the full construction test for a new candidate.
“The selected model-use structure is the discipline context.”Keep the optional A.22 Structure attached only to the named use; it is neither whole nor part by selection.
“Three viewpoints make the field multidisciplinary.”State a project-local breadth predicate over exact disciplines and contributions; viewpoint or structure count proves nothing.
“The journal, card, or dashboard carries the discipline.”Separate discipline, description episteme, publication occurrence, form, carrier, and health reading.
“A maturity drop created a new discipline edition.”Keep the C.21 result separate and apply the C.20 reidentification rule to actual construction changes.
“A later canon edition is the later discipline.”Apply C.2.1 to the canon and C.20 to the field; historical continuation and discipline continuity are separate claims.