fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 58596–58605

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:45:20 UTC

C.21:2 - Problem

Five recurrent failures make discipline-health claims unreliable:

  1. Object collapse. A definition set, Method, MethodDescription, measurement Work, result episteme, series episteme, publication occurrence, form, and carrier are called one “DHC artefact.”
  2. Scope slippage. ClaimScope and a selected TargetSlice are treated as interchangeable, although the scope states where the claim holds and the slice is only an optional computation or publication input.
  3. False crossing. Different sources or editions are assumed to require a Bridge even when C.16 direct-comparability conditions hold; conversely, distinct local senses are compared without their obtaining F.9 relation and loss account.
  4. Scale collapse. Formal recognition is ordered with adoption, alternative ratios are called one Characteristic, or entropy and HHI are placed in one field despite opposite directions.
  5. Assurance inflation. A cheap readable claim is forced through evidence graphs, registries, dashboard pins, and publication machinery that its receiving use does not consume.