C.21:6 - Archetypal Grounding (five domains)

C.21:6.1 - Computer vision: direct comparison without a Bridge

Two ReproducibilityRate results concern the same benchmark population and ClaimScope. Both cite the same Characteristic and ratio Scale editions, the same DHCMethodRef.edition, compatible model and calibration rules, and matching 24-month population windows. The team compares the two rates directly under that basis. The source reports have different publication editions, but no distinct F.17 local senses are being related, so no F.9 relation is invented.

Formal benchmark approval and actual benchmark adoption are reported separately as FormalRecognitionStatus and PracticeAdoptionRate.

C.21:6.2 - Biomedicine: evidence resolution without ratio substitution

One claim reports EvidenceUnitResolution = claim under ClinicalClaimSegmentation-3. A separate result reports SupportAnchorsPerClaim = 2.4 anchors/claim for the declared corpus. Neither value is substituted for ClaimsPerArtifact. Replication is a separate ReproducibilityRate over independent cohorts and a 36-month window.

C.21:6.3 - Software performance engineering: explicit cross-local use

The compared cells are OpenTelemetry:SLO/latency-objective@E4 and VendorB:SLO/service-level-target@E7. For this example, take F9-SPE-SLO-12 as an independently established directed F.9 Bridge from the OpenTelemetry cell to the VendorB cell under a satisfied predicate profile. A separate C.2.1 bounded-use claim states suitability for “compare service-latency objective coverage in the 2026 survey” in that direction, using only rows with the aligned 30-day window and tolerating no rolling-window mismatch. The evidence loss note records that the target cell permits a different rolling-window convention; the comparison still requires current A.10 reliance on the bounded-use claim. That directed relation is one counted member of the declared AlignmentDensity cell set; it does not make all tracing-ecosystem readings comparable.

C.21:6.4 - Decision-making: entropy and concentration stay separate

TraditionShareEntropy uses normalized Shannon entropy with base and category set fixed. TraditionShareConcentration uses HHI over the same population and has the opposite dispersion direction. A view may show both. If a receiving comparison wants one orientation, it declares 1-HHI as a transformation and still does not equate that Scale with normalized entropy.

C.21:6.5 - Evolutionary architecture: banded disruption

DisruptionBalance is computed over one declared corpus and method edition. The result is interpreted against an explicit target band and distance rule; a higher raw value is not automatically healthier. Architecture decision records and fitness tests remain inputs or neighboring objects, not evidence that the field itself is healthy.