C.22.1:13 - Relations
C.27 temporal-claim relation.
-
C.27 may flag: a claim that a holder, dyad, team, explicitly scoped specialist portfolio, or agent acquires usable specialization faster on one declared
TaskFamilyReforTaskSignature. A method may be selected, refined, or retired as part of that story. -
This pattern keeps: threshold target, time-to-threshold, budget-to-threshold, prior exposure, transfer, retention, downside, corridor-entry evidence, and adaptation-signature fields.
-
Non-admissible use: generic “learns faster” wording without task-family anchors does not create a C.27 profile or a complete adaptation signature; faster threshold crossing is not durable specialization unless transfer, retention, downside, and corridor-entry evidence are stated when claimed.
-
Next-question boundary: classify the claim as Dyn1 when only a trend is live; use C.24 for call planning after the action or option is fixed; use the C.22.1 adaptation signature when specialization is the live adaptation question.
Builds on: C.22 TaskSignature anchoring, C.19.1 BLP compatibility, A.15 system-role-kind and assignment, Method, WorkPlan, and Work-occurrence separation, C.24 scout or probe and CheckpointReturn semantics, E.16 budget enforcement.
Coordinates with: G.5 selector specialization profiles, G.9 adaptation parity, G.11 later telemetry/refresh reuse.
Coordinates with: E.23 when a quality-improvement loop claims durable task-family specialization. C.22.1 carries the adaptation-signature fields for threshold target, time-to-threshold, budget-to-threshold, prior exposure, transfer, retention, downside, and corridor entry; it does not restate the E.23 loop method, E.22 review framing, or pattern-quality or DRR-adequacy object-under-improvement evaluations.
Constrained by: E.10 lexical discipline; E.19 governs admission or refresh review of the pattern edition.