Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:35:10 UTC

C.22.2:2.6 - Anti-Pattern Checks and Worked Slices

Anti-pattern checks start from the local card use:

  • card-as-executable-work request: the card is treated as executable work while method, plan, and work occurrence remain undecided;
  • form-completion: every field is filled because the template exists, even though the Thin next use would be truthful;
  • readiness shortcut: P2W-ready is declared from signal and scope alone, without improvement check or acceptance probe;
  • source-claim shortcut: a preselected solution, work request, proof-looking reference, gate-looking cue, or authority-looking cue replaces one or more core Thin items in C.22.2:2.1;
  • scalar shortcut: archive, set-return, Goldilocks, NQD, OEE, partial-order, stepping-stone, or indicator material collapses into one readiness score;
  • prestige shortcut: first-principles or mathematical wording is kept without practical payoff, preserved and lost structure when current, problem-formulation follow-up reason, and stop condition.

Local stop rule: if the encountered material tries to carry a claim outside C.22.2, the card keeps only the cue or reference that changes problem formulation or the next use, then names the governing FPF pattern and claim kind named by value to use before that claim is relied on.

A conforming C.22.2 use is testable against at least one Thin worked slice, such as repeated task rework or another compact problem signal, showing signal, EntityOfConcern, ReferenceScheme, ClaimScope, exact claim family, not-preselected-work reason, improvement check, and honest next use. It is also testable against at least one High-relation worked slice from a set, archive, pool, front, shortlist, selected set, or portfolio source, showing sourceSetRef, candidate acceptance criterion, risk condition, and the claim, relation, or boundary without creating a local portfolio or archive kind.