Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:15:03 UTC

C.22.PFR:7 - Conformance Checklist

  1. The actual condition is an explicitly individuated obtaining U.Relation under its direct pattern.
  2. CharacteristicSpacePredicate is given by value and includes one exact ConditionToPredicateInputRule: either a direct governed characteristic assignment/state relation or a named governed projection/bridge to the exact coordinate, scale, and problem-for link. A criterion-description identifier, arbitrary relation reference, or plausible alternative projection is insufficient.
  3. ProblemCriterionApplicabilityRelation has the predicate, exact problem-for entity, claim scope, and declared criterion-applicability window as its four participants. It obtains while that criterion governs those participants, independently of adverse-condition satisfaction; its occurrence extent is the maximal continuous period of actual applicability.
  4. PFR has exactly two non-derived participant slots: actual condition and criterion applicability.
  5. Predicate, entity, scope, declared criterion-applicability window, and actual applicability-occurrence extent are projected from applicability rather than copied into PFR.
  6. The selected direct consumer obtains the exact point through the declared direct assignment or projection and governs comparator, cuts or bands, polarity, admissibility, evaluation, and support; the condition relation is never treated as a coordinate by itself.
  7. Evaluation work, outcomes, measurements, evidence, assessment claims, descriptions, and cards do not create or identify PFR by default.
  8. Repeated PFR occurrences use the two participant references plus actual adverse inception. Add a stable occurrence identifier only for co-inceptions or a receiving history that must survive revision of the claimed inception boundary; the currently asserted start, derived end, and completed extent are not mutable key fields.
  9. [adverseEpisodeStart, open] is used only by a claim that supports current continuous obtaining; a later supported end completes the claimed extent on the same stable occurrence reference.
  10. Actual non-adverse B between actual adverse A and C yields two world-side PFR occurrences. Evidence can support, refute, or leave that boundary unresolved; a gap alone proves neither one occurrence nor two.
  11. Method availability and solvability claims remain separate from PFR actuality and identity.
  12. Possible conditions remain exact forecast, scenario, counterfactual, or anticipated-condition claims under their direct governors until both participant relations and adverse predicate truth obtain; assertion polarity and reliance posture do not substitute for those obtaining conditions.
  13. Ordinary readable use can stop before explicit PFR materialization when no receiving claim needs Problem identity.
  14. Battery-voltage, proof-gap, clinical-condition, missed-transfer, and hot-surface cases remain explicitly non-conforming until their named direct condition and, where applicable, problem-for/applicability governors exist; a phrase, measurement, diagnosis, record, card, or structural transfer does not mint them.