C.23:9 - Rationale

For a named admission-assurance claim, B.3 requires each of F, G, and R that the use consumes to have a declared bearer, meaning, and scale. Claim scope and selected USM slices remain explicit; WLNK and Φ(CL) are used only under an applicable, calibrated aggregation or loss rule. Treating maturity as evidence‑typed rungs—rather than a “score”—avoids illegal arithmetic and keeps locally declared DesignRunTag values under their actual temporal predicates and C.27 adequacy conditions, with explicit GateCrossings only when a selected E.18 transformation-flow structure contains them. This mirrors the cited 2018 science‑of‑science insights: replication, benchmarking, and field health indicators are the currency of maturity, not anecdote. (Science)