| CC-C26.1.1 | The boundary, role relation, authority relation, bridge, split, or queried system edge is named. |
| CC-C26.1.2 | The active probe or interaction lane is typed as work, method, measurement, speech act, interaction channel, evidence carrier, bridge/export act, or API/service operation; any quantum-instrument wording is recorded only as a modeling analogy unless formalized elsewhere. |
| CC-C26.1.3 | Observable, probe method, measurement scheme or interaction scheme, emitted output or result record, update class, and evidence carrier are separated when they carry the claim. |
| CC-C26.1.4 | The QL cue or formal cue is named, or the case is handled without QL wording. |
| CC-C26.1.5 | The false passive reading or unjustified lossless-transfer reading is stated. |
| CC-C26.1.6 | The pre-probe hypothesis and observed/inferred post-probe state are stated without fake precision. |
| CC-C26.1.7 | State-change evidence and uncertainty/confidence posture are stated. |
| CC-C26.1.8 | State history, memory, path dependence, or order/frame sensitivity is stated when load-bearing. |
| CC-C26.1.9 | The state change, export loss, or viability change caused by the probe/interaction is stated. |
| CC-C26.1.10 | The output is one of the pattern finish conditions. |
| CC-C26.1.11 | The decoupling, probe-redesign, order-redesign, frame-redesign, bridge-redesign, or boundary-redesign option is stated when it could reduce the problem. |
| CC-C26.1.12 | The local evidence posture is stated when the claim is reused, contested, or higher consequence. |
| CC-C26.1.13 | Ordinary intervention, bridge, work, measurement, and viability routes are tried before QL wording is retained. |
| CC-C26.1.14 | Coupling or interaction wording becomes a reusable relation name under F.18 only after the relation and participants are settled under their direct pattern; A.6.P is used when their meaning remains unclear. |
| CC-C26.1.15 | The pattern inherits QL-NQ from C.26 instead of restating the inherited boundary as local law. |