Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 16:02:47 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 16:03:51 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 16:20:10 UTC

C.26.2:7 - Conformance Checklist

IDCheck
CC-C26.2.1The collective bearer is a declared U.System or collective system, not a bare group label.
CC-C26.2.2Observed coordinated work, behavior, and trace pattern is named.
CC-C26.2.3Evidence carriers and time window are named.
CC-C26.2.4The QL cue / formal cue is named if QL wording is retained.
CC-C26.2.5Persistence class, decay or refresh condition, and reprobe cost are named when the claim is not momentary.
CC-C26.2.6The minimal supported claim is stated.
CC-C26.2.7At least one substantive ordinary rival explanation is named.
CC-C26.2.8The compound-state decomposition separates whole system, subsystems, local readings, factorable part, and coordination residue when the distributed-state reading is load-bearing.
CC-C26.2.9Any survey, dashboard, report, API response, or policy sentence is typed as representation, carrier, or export, not as the distributed state itself.
CC-C26.2.10Probe / measurement approximation, attempted export, faithful-enough criterion, loss cause, and higher-fidelity export possibility are stated when export or measurement carries the claim.
CC-C26.2.11Export loss is stated when the claim depends on export that is not faithful enough for the declared use.
CC-C26.2.12The evidence posture is stated when the claim is reused, contested, or higher consequence.
CC-C26.2.13Formal measurement uses C.16; evidence provenance and bounded reliance use A.10; actual named assurance claims use B.3, and QLP-3 requires a B.3 assurance result for the named QL target claim and receiving use; loss in a cross-context Bridge between exact local senses uses F.9.
CC-C26.2.14The pattern inherits QL-NQ from C.26 and does not mint U.DistributedState.