| CC-C26.3.1 | The viability bearer is one exact System under A.1, one exact A.22 U.Structure under all four identity discriminators, or another exact subject under its direct identity rule; the local position introduces no kind, relation, or configuration object. |
| CC-C26.3.2 | The protected promise or function is named. |
| CC-C26.3.3 | Envelope variables or quality-bundle dimensions and the viable region / bounds are named. |
| CC-C26.3.4 | Disturbance class and scenario/window are named. |
| CC-C26.3.5 | Sensors/probes and their possible behavior-changing or dimension-hiding effects are named when measurement carries the envelope claim. |
| CC-C26.3.6 | Each candidate intervention is recovered as a proposal about an exact Method, description, setting proposal, WorkPlan, access or permission claim, or Bridge proposal or description; dated Work, actual change, obtaining relation occurrence, and resulting state remain separate. A fixed F.9 Bridge is never the object revised or ended by Work; an endpoint/profile change opens a new candidate that must pass F.9 independently. |
| CC-C26.3.7 | The boundary condition is stated. When regulation is proposed, the trade-off condition and adaptation cost are stated. |
| CC-C26.3.8 | Failure mode and re-probe/destabilization condition are stated. |
| CC-C26.3.9 | Metrics or dashboards are not treated as the envelope itself. |
| CC-C26.3.10 | The QL cue / formal cue is named if QL wording is retained. |
| CC-C26.3.11 | QL wording appears only when probe, order, export, coarsening, or incompatible frame interaction remains load-bearing and satisfies C.26’s contextual-model obstruction condition. |
| CC-C26.3.12 | Rate/inertia/damping/effort and second-order dynamics variables appear only when load-bearing. |
| CC-C26.3.13 | Homeostasis, allostasis, active inference, and Markov-boundary wording are restored into FPF subject patterns before they carry the claim; Markov-blanket wording does not by itself create boundary, interface, component, agency, or viability authority. |
| CC-C26.3.14 | The pattern adds no new control ontology. |