C.26:10 - Rationale

The cluster stays small on purpose. A single giant “Quantum-Like Architecture” pattern would hide distinct modeling concerns. Scattering the lens across local pattern bodies would repeat the same definition and boundary notes. This modeling-lens pattern lets the common lens live once while child patterns carry their own primary EntityOfConcern and admissible move.

The key rule is simple: quantum-like is not quantum. With that boundary explicit, FPF can use the mathematical lens normally. The lens earns its keep when it prevents a passive-read, one-space comparison, faithful-copy, or exact-state shortcut.

Literature supports the modeling move; local evidence supports the local state, export, or probe claim. A source anchor can justify why order effects, contextual probability, instrument-like readings, or open-system modeling are legitimate modeling patterns. It does not prove that this dashboard changed this team’s state, that this workshop changed a boundary, or that this export lost the live coordination. That proof or evidence still belongs under A.10, C.16, A.15, B.3, and the ordinary pattern for the local claim.