C.26:12 - Relations · fpf.tools

C.28 causal-use relation.

C.28 governs causal-use question, causality-ladder rung, causal estimand, identification, counterfactual sampling realizability, causal evidence support basis, causal-use verdict, causal fairness, causal policy, and causal method parity.
This pattern keeps residual quantum-like probe, frame, order, export, or coarsening discipline after ordinary causal-use explanation has been tried.
Non-admissible use: intervention, causal effect, causal fairness, causal policy, counterfactual comparison, causal method parity, or counterfactual-rung-data realizability do not activate quantum-like modeling by themselves.
Exit: when the question under repair is causal, cite C.28 before retaining QL-lite or QL-NQ.

C.27 temporal-claim relation.

C.27 may flag: ordinary state/rate/rate-change, effort-window, rhythm, braking, coasting, or intervention-timing claims before any quantum-like cue is considered.
This pattern keeps: residual quantum-like probe, frame, order, export, or coarsening discipline.
Non-admissible use: discreteness, finite differences, typed states, state-space reduction, tokenization, dashboards, probes, measurement plans, speed words, rhythm words, or Dyn2 words do not activate quantum-like modeling by themselves.
Boundary: use C.27 and ordinary FPF patterns first; use C.26 only where residual probe, frame, order, export, or coarsening cue remains after those relations are named.
Builds on: E.8, E.9, C.11, C.16, C.25, A.6, A.6.P, F.9, E.24.PUB, E.17, E.17.EFP, A.15, A.10, B.3, A.3, C.18, C.19, A.19.
Constrains: QL wording in C.26.1, C.26.2, and C.26.3.
Carries: state-representation coarsening as a card inside C.26:4.5, not as a separate pattern.
Does not cover: physical quantum claims, a generic probe ontology, a generic state ontology, a service/cell pattern, or a field-like synchronization pattern.
Name boundary: Quantum-Like Modeling Lens is a pattern label for a modeling lens and modeling discipline.