| Domain workshop changes the split | Direct boundary/Work patterns, then F.9 for exact cross-local-sense interpretation and C.26.1 only for a surviving probe obstruction | The workshop is both evidence and intervention; question order or facilitation frame changes the recommendation, team alignment, or exact local sense. | Do not replace DDD or direct relation law with QL; keep exact claim scope, reference scheme, local-sense endpoint, and bridge/export loss visible. |
| Same label in different semantic localities | F.9, designation, and direct scope or model-use patterns | An admitted probe or export changes operational state, or the carried expression loses load-bearing local sense. | Same spelling is not same sense and does not establish a Bridge, grounding relation, joint algebra, or subject crossing. |
| Organization acts from a latent decision | A.15, A.10, B.3, C.26.2 | Coordinated Work under exact system-role assignments, records, commitments, traces, and routines evidence a low-recoverability state no participant faithfully reports. | Do not infer a group mind or timeless culture. |
| Survey, dashboard, policy, or API read of culture | C.16, A.10, F.9, C.26.1, C.26.2 | The probe may change the state it evidences, and the export may lose load-bearing structure. | Treat the output as carrier/probe, not as the state itself. |
| Service boundary under load | C.25, A.6, A.15, C.26.3 | Viability depends on changing caching, throttling, routing, staffing, protocol, Bridge, or selected model-use boundary. | Do not reduce viability to one green metric. |
| Moving body or sensor to see the missing face | active or embodied inference accounts, C.26:4.5 state-representation coarsening card | The system spends energy, time, risk, attention, or coordination to obtain a discriminating observation. | Do not call ordinary sensing or active inference quantum-like without a QL cue. |
| Glass memory / hysteresis | C.26.1, C.26.3, U.Dynamics | Prior state constrains current response; state history or retained trace changes admissible reading. | Do not force dynamics variables unless load-bearing. |
| Cell-like service or access analogy | A.6.P:4.11a, then only the exact boundary, interaction, Work, viability, repair, or other subject pattern needed by the claim | Cell-like criteria may suggest questions about boundary, controlled exchange, protected invariants, repair, state-continuity, or a resource analogue; they do not make those claims obtain together. | Retain the analogy only when one recovered direct claim changes the decision and an ordinary subject pattern does not already carry the residual QL issue. |
| Suspect option menu | B.5.2, C.18, C.19, A.19 | Current options may be products of the current measurement frame. | QL only marks suspicion; search patterns generate alternatives. |