Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 10:39:28 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:40:04 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 11:20:03 UTC

C.26:7 - Conformance Checklist

IDCheck
CC-C26.1The text names the ordinary FPF pattern before admitting QL wording.
CC-C26.2The text states the QL cue as a probe, order, frame, export, comparison, open-information-system update/probe/export-admissibility, or coarsening effect, not as vague complexity.
CC-C26.3The text states a practical representational payoff.
CC-C26.4The text states the minimal admissible output.
CC-C26.5The text states a local stop or neighboring-pattern handoff.
CC-C26.6The text inherits QL-NQ and does not repeat global physical-quantum exclusions as local guidance.
CC-C26.7If a representation shortcut is used, the coarsening card names source, shortcut, loss, admissible use, non-admissible use, and reopen trigger.
CC-C26.8A speed, compression, linearity, or tractability claim declaration names baseline representation and cost, changed representation, mechanism, claimed gain, loss budget or error budget, ordinary alternatives, evidence source or formal source, and reopen trigger.
CC-C26.9The support matches the receiving claim and reliance described in :12b. A prediction, model-adoption, assurance or comparative-performance conclusion receives its needed account; a conditional explanation reused under the same assumptions retains its sufficient account.
CC-C26.10The text does not mint U.Probe, generic U.State, U.DistributedState, U.Lens, a new boundary kind, or a social-substance kind.
CC-C26.11A cold reader can tell what changes in practice in the first minute.
CC-C26.12Every quality ascription or model claim carried by C.26 names the exact bearer or C.2.1 claim-bearing episteme, effective U.ReferenceScheme, probe/model frame, comparison frame, U.ClaimScope, and the separately obtaining grounding relation or its explicit absence.
CC-C26.13Any viewpoint use has one U.ViewpointRef resolving to exact P; the evaluator, P, and the reference remain distinct.
CC-C26.14C.26 opens only for one named contextual-model obstruction that survives ordinary subject patterns and changes an admissible inference or action; local outputs stay in their own algebras unless an admitted comparison route exists.
CC-C26.15A BoundedModelUseStructure is selected independently for a named receiving use, and any subject crossing has its own exact direct governor and occurrence.
CC-C26-CAUSAL-EXITIf the question under repair is intervention, counterfactual comparison, causal effect, causal fairness, causal policy, off-policy causal evaluation, or realizability of counterfactual-rung data, the text redirects the claim or question to C.28 before retaining QL-lite or QL-NQ.