C.27.TA:4.2 - Temporal Aspect Statement

Use this fuller statement only when the four-part first result is not enough for the receiving use:

TemporalAspectStatementClaimContent:
  entityOfConcernRef:
  aspectPredicate:
  temporalReference:
  windowOrInterval:
  entityRulePatternCitation?:
  effectiveReferenceSchemeRef?:
  claimOrWorkScopeRef?:
  selectedStructureRef?:
  sourceOrUseBoundaryRef?:
  localUseCondition?:
  measuredReadingRef?:
  directRelationDeclarationRef?:
  obtainingRelationOccurrenceRef?:
  receivingUseRulePatternCitation?:
  validityOrCurrentnessCondition?:
  refreshOrReopenCondition?:
  blockedLocalOverread?:

When this statement is materialized, the record is ClaimGraph content in one C.2.1 episteme. entityOfConcernRef resolves the exact bearer or exact claim being qualified. aspectPredicate says what is asserted of it; the label does not identify a temporal-aspect object. The first four fields are the normal minimum.

Every remaining field is conditional. Add it only when changing that value could change the claim or the receiving action. PatternID citations tell the reader which rule to apply and assert no relation. If the claim relies on another direct relation, cite its exact declaration and cite an obtaining occurrence only after its predicate passes. There is no generic context field; each optional scheme, scope, Structure, source or use boundary, or local-use condition keeps the identity and test supplied by its direct pattern.