fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 63381–63403

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:50:20 UTC

C.27:9 - Consequences and Reopen Conditions

C.27 makes intervention-sensitive temporal claims inspectable while keeping ordinary state and rate prose cheap. Its cost is one small card and exact references only when the receiving use needs them.

Refresh remains proportional:

  • a local card needs one reopen trigger;
  • a boundary-crossing claim may also need a validity window and evidence currentness;
  • G.11 carries refresh orchestration, and B.3.4 carries evidence decay and epistemic debt.

Reopen when, for example:

  • a claim, sampling, intervention, baseline, follow-up, or validity window changes;
  • a rhythm bearer, temporal reference, rhythm window, proxy, or coupling changes;
  • effort, resource, actual System actor, assignment, authority, or availability changes;
  • resistance changes because tooling, work mix, queue topology, constraints, or service demand changed;
  • a measure becomes a target, gate, dashboard, incentive, or public comparison;
  • cross-scale transfer is attempted;
  • results reverse, overshoot, oscillate, stall, or become unstable;
  • hidden queues, rework, burnout, quality loss, service demand, safety demand, or coordination debt appear;
  • the use changes from local diagnosis or planning to benchmark, causal, assurance, promise-like, publication, gate, or formal-model use;
  • a coasting, braking, recovery, or stabilization claim outlives its evidence or assumption.