fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 64337–64357

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 06:10:20 UTC

C.28:12 - Relations

  • C.28.CM constructs and challenges causal models when the mechanism relations or material alternatives are still missing; the returned model retains its assumptions and evidential limits.

  • C.28.MR derives an intervention consequence within a supplied causal model, with the replacement, retained conditions and solution needed by that query.

  • C.16 keeps measurements and scales; C.27 keeps temporal-claim adequacy.

  • A.10 keeps evidence paths and provenance and may cite C.28 support components and result.

  • A.2.4 classifies how an episteme is used; it cannot promote simulation output or association into stronger causal evidence.

  • A.15 keeps Method, plan, Work, and attribution for interventions, target trials, and sampling.

  • B.3 may cite a C.28 result as one basis for a separate bounded assurance result.

  • C.11, C.19, and C.24 keep choice, pool treatment, and call planning and consume only the needed causal refs.

  • D.5 keeps bias/fairness audit and uses BiasAuditReport@Context when a causal fairness question is consequential or reusable.

  • G.5 keeps method dispatch; G.9 keeps parity and benchmark conclusions; G.11 keeps refresh planning.

  • C.26 is used only for a residual quantum-like modelling issue after ordinary causal explanations are tried.

C.28:12.1 - C.29 mathematical-lens relation

C.29 may describe a mapping as abstraction-like, quotient-like, coarse-graining-like, simulation-like, or macro-model-like. It does not decide causal support. When intervention, policy, counterfactual, causal explanation, or causal decision use is current, apply C.28; otherwise record no causal-use claim or the exact blocker.