Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:00:08 UTC

C.29.1:4.1 - Recover the result and the direction in which it will be used

Start with the receiving question. Say what is to be determined and what difference the answer makes: whether another reservation is allowed, the cost of a chosen route, the least possible route cost, or a temperature bound at a specified time. These questions can concern the same objects and require different retained information.

Recover the source result together with the ingredients that produced it:

  • the allowed inputs and the meaning of their quantities;
  • the operations or relations used in the inference;
  • the premises and operation conditions on which the conclusion depends.

Use an existing derivation when these ingredients are available. If an explanation gives only a final formula, recover the missing construction or argument through B.5:4.2 and B.5:4.3. The transfer comparison begins once the required source step is clear enough to reproduce.

Then name the direction of use. There are several common possibilities.

Intended useCorrespondence to establish
Represent a source result in another accountSource inputs and steps have receiving counterparts, with the needed conclusion preserved.
Calculate in another account and answer about a source inputThe receiving calculation, applied to that input’s representation, returns the sought source quantity or a justified bound on it.
Choose a receiving solution and carry it back as an actionThe selected receiving solution has an allowed source counterpart, and the returned counterpart has the claimed properties.
Transfer a theorem to an entire receiving domainThe theorem’s premises and inference steps survive, and the domain claimed in the conclusion is covered.

The last two uses are stronger than merely mapping source cases forward. Keeping the direction explicit prevents an answer about a relaxed problem from becoming an unsupported action recommendation.