C.29:4.2d - Architecture-local lens descriptions
Architecture work may use C.29-local descriptions for graph, flow, control, structural-information, RG or coarse-graining, and multilevel-learning or frustration lenses.
| Local C.29 description | Candidate mathematical object | Visible payoff | Stop condition |
|---|---|---|---|
MLU.Description@ArchitectureGraphDSM | typed graph, hypergraph, DSM, DMM, or MDM matrix | dependencies, clusters, change propagation, and bottlenecks | for semantic interface correctness, compositional quality, or an architecture decision, apply the pattern for that separate claim |
MLU.Description@TransformationFlowStructure | graph, morphism-family, wiring, matrix, or network expression over a selected TransformationFlowStructure | flow topology, crossings, carried relations, and path slices without hidden scalarization | for a Work occurrence, gate decision, or evidence claim, apply its subject pattern |
MLU.Description@ArchitectureLCA | layered control structure or multi-rate control model | planner, regulator, plant, observer, feedback timing, and externality separation | stability or causal-use questions require their dynamics, evidence, and C.28 basis |
MLU.Description@EpiplexityStructuralInformation | bounded-observer structural information or two-part code | learnable reusable structure versus residual or unmodeled structure | establish any utility, assurance, out-of-distribution guarantee, or causal-proof claim through its subject pattern |
MLU.Description@RGArchitecture | scale map over architecture descriptions, fixed-point or basin metaphor, or declared coarse-graining map | scale-stability of an architecture vector and exploding exceptions | a literal physical-RG claim requires its domain theory |
MLU.Description@MultilevelLearningFrustration | multilevel learning over structurally renormalizable descriptions, frustrated optimization landscape, or variational residual model | residual-reducing architecture moves across declared scopes or holon levels | a project-wide optimization claim requires a separately justified global function |
MLU.Description@RGArchitecture applies only when the use names a declared aggregation scope, scale variable or scale window, coarse-graining rule, preserved structure, lost structure, source-return condition, declared use, and stop condition. Include a blocked overread only when it passes F.19’s plausible-reader test. If the claim becomes a scale-preference claim, C.31.ASAP governs the architecture preference side; C.29 keeps the declared mathematical-lens use.
Minimum RG architecture description:
MLU.Description@RGArchitecture:
TargetPhenomenon:
CandidateMathObject:
LensMappingMode:
ScaleWindow?:
CoarseGrainingRule?:
PreservedStructure:
LostStructure:
VisiblePayoff:
SourceReturnCondition?:
declaredLensUse:
NextLensUseAction:
StopCondition:
blockedLensOverread?:
For architecture work, a common RG-shaped candidate object is:
A_l = (Holons_l, FunctionalRelations_l, FlowRelations_l, ControlRelations_l,
ModuleRelations_l, InterfaceSpecificationRefs_l, DependencyEdges_l,
WorkMethodRefs_l, EvidencePackageRefs_l, QualifierRefs_l)
R_l : A_l -> A_{l+1}
InterfaceSpecificationRefs_l contains only governed U.EpistemeRef values that resolve independently identified InterfaceSpecification epistemes under the identifying rule located at A.6.M. The references, their resolution, and the specification content remain separate; changing a lens token or retargeting a reference does not edit the specification.
The index _l is a declared aggregation-scope index inside this C.29 lens, not a generic level, tier, layer, or ladder. Each use names the aggregation scope, the coarse-graining rule, the lost structure, and the source-return condition.
MLU.Description@MultilevelLearningFrustration applies only when the use names declared holon levels or declared scopes, a mapping between them, conflicting constraints or residuals, preserved structure, lost structure, and the nearest neighboring FPF pattern for any measurement, causal, evidence, assurance, work, selected-set, or decision claim.
Minimum multilevel-learning and frustration description:
MLU.Description@MultilevelLearningFrustration:
TargetPhenomenon:
CandidateMathObject:
LensMappingMode:
PreservedStructure:
LostStructure:
VisiblePayoff:
declaredLensUse:
NextLensUseAction:
SourceReturnCondition?:
StopCondition:
blockedLensOverread?:
Declared lens use: triage, explanation, candidate generation, rival-lens comparison, scale-window reasoning, source-return triggers, and architecture-decision rationale only when the neighboring pattern defines or constrains any non-C.29 claim. Stop or return when the mapping, scale window, preserved structure, or source basis no longer supports the use. A causal-proof, assurance-score, or necessary-complexity-growth claim needs its own argument and source basis. Apply C.11, C.28, B.3, C.16, G.5, or the applicable stakeholder or ethics pattern when its respective non-C.29 claim is current. Include a project-wide-optimizer or other blocked overread only when it passes F.19’s plausible-reader test.