C.29:4.5d - When a source changes the used result
C.29 separates source-use relations from source-use disposition. Adopt, Adapt, Reject, and candidate-stress-test disposition say what FPF does with the source; SourceUseRelation says what work the source may perform inside a C.29 application.
Local SourceUseRelation slot discipline:
- source material reference or locator;
- declared C.29 output, lens-use boundary, or
LensUseBoundaryValueaffected by that source; - source-use disposition for the substantive use: adopt, adapt, reject, candidate stress test or recognition cue;
- currentness, supersession, contradiction, narrowing, or demotion condition;
- output-change condition for the C.29 result;
- stop or return condition, and any blocked overread that passes F.19’s plausible-reader test.
SourceUseRelation | Declared C.29 use | Use boundary or return |
|---|---|---|
recognitionCue | Help the reader notice an invariant, obstruction, symmetry, duality, state variable, scale cue, or comparison cue. | For evidence, truth, ontology, a causal-use verdict, assurance, or release confidence, establish that separate claim and its basis through its subject pattern. |
candidateLensPrompt | Suggest a first candidate lens family or mathematical object to test against the problem cue being repaired. | Test a candidate cheaply when it could change the next lens-use action; require use of that lens only after its contribution is established. |
adequacyControlSource | Discipline preserved structure, lost structure, stop condition, validation regime, or neighboring-pattern application. | Satisfy C.29’s field requirements and the applicable subject pattern for the resulting claim. |
validationBoundarySource | Constrain the declared validation regime, evaluation slice, uncertainty, failure case, or domain of applicability. | An evidence relation, assurance claim, benchmark result, or release confidence requires its own basis and subject-pattern result. |
acceptedDomainTheory | Permit local use inside a domain where the theory is already the governing local formalism. | For cross-context ontology import or broader transfer, establish the needed evidence relation and a stop condition; apply F.9 when semantic correspondence between local senses is needed. |
proofUnderAssumptions | Justify a formal property under stated assumptions. | A formal proof can support a real-world-adequacy claim only when its assumptions, observations, and evidence relation are also established, together with any needed semantic Bridge. |
negativeExample | Expose failure, obstruction, non-transfer, counterexample, or stop condition. | Scope the result to the demonstrated failure and its return condition. |
rivalLensSource | Name a principal rival lens or relation that changes the bounded lens-use action being made. | Keep the principal-rival choice bounded to the current lens-use action. Undertake a literature review, or establish a selector or benchmark result, only for that separately current question. |