Link to current text
C.3.3:4 - Forces
| Force | Tension to resolve |
|---|
| Same-kind reuse vs bridge discipline | Do not invent a bridge for provenance, but make real distinct-kind correspondence explicit. |
| Minimal disclosure vs precision | State only what the receiving use consumes while keeping direction, definedness, and loss inspectable. |
| Local autonomy vs reuse | Receiving kinds keep their membership distinctions; correspondence does not merge them. |
| Separate channels vs workload | Scope, sense, and kind correspondence remain separate without forcing all three into every use. |
| Fresh truth vs useful support | Source results may support reliance but never substitute for receiving admissibility or judgment. |